Excellent article in the Economist magazine about innovation coming from smaller or larger companies. Also a fine example of concise analysis/ synthesis of a given issue.
We continue to learn from the collapse of Jon Corzine’s MF Global. A recent article at NYT’s Dealbook highlights another lesson: ignore your chief risk or compliance officer at your own peril. While we agree that in this case it might have led to different and better decisions, such officers are still prone to all the talent, behavioral and incentives-driven traps and pitfalls. That said, the simple governance, hierarchical and process improvements the author suggests do help, and he also has the merit of recognizing that “Leadership has the right to challenge, disagree or even reject that advice.” Remember: “Culture eats Strategy for breakfast”.
TV show “60 Minutes” had a profile of Howard Buffett following Buffett’s appointment of him as his preferred choice for non-Executive Chairman after Buffett somehow relinquishes that role. As a guardian of Berkshire’s unique culture, he is as good as it gets. We collect a few links and videos about Howard Buffett.
Interesting food for thought on Apple’s capital allocation issues and it ties well with our last two posts on capital allocation. Just a reminder: this post is highlighted exclusively for overall capital allocation policies that might be applied to other investments. Buysiders.com doesn’t advise on specific stocks nor do we make any recommendations, as highlighted in the post.
Much noise has been generated by MidAmerican’s purchase of First Solar’s $2 billion Topaz solar energy project. Yes, MidAmerican is Berkshire’s utility/ energy subsidiary and this sizable acquisition has certainly been cleared by Warren Buffett. That does not mean that “Buffett is buying/ betting on solar” as a category. It is Berkshire taking advantage of an opportunity.
When we commented on share buybacks recently, we alluded to the “bad name” that M&A has received. We mentioned that, on average, M&A “destroys value” as defined by some academic studies and as seen in real life all too often. We’ve now come accross a Strategy & Business article listing “the top-10 M&A fallacies and self-deceptions”, and it’s a good list of reasons why M&A may go wrong, or may not be the best choice. Change a few words and some of the 10 points can be used to consider share buybacks as well.
Share buybacks have an “aura” of shareholder-friendliness. When done right, it’s a very efficient way of rewarding long-term shareholders and reaffirming management’s confidence in the company’s future prospects, usually after the shares have gone down. However, companies can get it wrong and sometimes very much so. Teased by an article, we discuss a few ways things can go wrong.
The IMF has recently issued a report on China’s financial system’s stability that has grabbed plenty of headlines, and yet today it seemed that there were pessimistic articles about banking all over the world. European and US banks are also the subject of stories that highlight risk, interconnectedness, poor balance sheets etc.. While the financials’ situation isn’t necessarily news, it is the trend that’s interesting. Inside we collect quite a few articles about the world’s financial system, all of them very from yesterday or today. Collectively they plant a bleak picture, one that seems very different from what we (still) observe in Brazil’s banking system. It’s very hard to separate signal from noise, especially so in the middle of a crisis, but it’s great food for thought.
It’s a holiday in Brazil, our Proclamation of the Republic day, so we thought we would go “light” today. It’s been a while since our last “humor” post… Two funny, yet very serious, cartoons inside. Brush them aside at your own peril! (there goes the “light” touch…)
In a thought-provoking op-ed, Ross Douthat tells a very summarized history of Jon Corzine (of MF Global infamy). He notes that America has been fertile ground for a kind of “reckless meritocracy” where brilliant, ambitious people who work very hard actually get to very high places – which is great – and then proceed to do themselves, their companies and society in general great harm by failing spectacularly. Mr. Douthat says this happens or has been happening “mostly by (this elite) being too smart for its own good”. We were ready to disagree with him until we got to the last two paragraphs – the text is actually great.
