We’re still digesting the MF Global collapse, and we’re guessing it will be the case study for the intersection of risk management and culture/ incentive systems – not that it could ever be separated, but this was the case that really drove it home because of the inconceivable use of client funds… We highlight several articles on counterparty risk, fraud and MF Global inside.
DLD 2012 has started today in Munich and runs until Jan. 24th. In it, people as diverse as Sheryl Sandberg, Arianna Huffington, the Dyson family and Hiroshi Mikitani share their views on what matters to them. The themes are varied and the program is packed with interesting talks and panels. In the age of multi-disciplinary events, this is one of the best.
Just as in our September 2011 post called “How to spot a fraud”, a Wall Street Journal piece tells another story about returns that look too good to be true – but in this case, “too good” means “low volatility”. The point here is the ages-old trap of equating “risk” with “volatility” and assuming that a low-volatility fund is less risky. Even ignoring the possibility of fraud, it’s a bad move.
Two recent stories highlight the current moral double standards regarding defaults and indebtedness in general. The first article uses American Airlines’ Chapter 11 filing, lauded as a “smart move”, and contrasts this reaction to the stigma surrounding personal bankruptcies by home owners. The second article tries to tack the same “double standards” theme onto Germany, but it doesn’t work nearly as well.
In another building block in the “Banking: Global Mess” series, the World Bank says in a report released yesterday that the Latin American financial systems still seem sound, but there are a few yellow flags. The embedded 3-min video interview (inside) is a nice summary of findings.
Bill Miller himself once said: “This is a brutal business, success equals survival. If you have survived, you will have succeeded”. We have said it a little differently since 1988: to finish first, you must first finish. Mr. Miller, famous for his 15-year streak of beating the S&P 500, has announced that he will step down as co-manager of the Legg Mason Value Trust in April 2012. Is Mr. Miller’s rise and subsequent fall a matter of genius becoming overconfidence or simple probability theory playing out – as per Taleb? Not knowing the inside workings of Legg Mason, no one can really claim to know the answer. To help us think about it, we collect several links inside.
The IMF has recently issued a report on China’s financial system’s stability that has grabbed plenty of headlines, and yet today it seemed that there were pessimistic articles about banking all over the world. European and US banks are also the subject of stories that highlight risk, interconnectedness, poor balance sheets etc.. While the financials’ situation isn’t necessarily news, it is the trend that’s interesting. Inside we collect quite a few articles about the world’s financial system, all of them very from yesterday or today. Collectively they plant a bleak picture, one that seems very different from what we (still) observe in Brazil’s banking system. It’s very hard to separate signal from noise, especially so in the middle of a crisis, but it’s great food for thought.
According to the news, this is the line MF Global insiders used when questioned why they went along with Jon Corzine’s trades: “He was from Goldman Sachs”. Thus Mr. Corzine guided MF Global to a very public, very messy bankruptcy – and hundreds of millions of dollars of client money are missing. We wrote just days ago, regarding the “key people” aspect of a company: “Ultimately, it’s all about the key people (…) – it’s vital to understand their real motivations, aspirations, personalities and incentive/moral systems. Not what they say it is, what it really is.” Finding out about a given company’s true culture is just as difficult and time consuming, and as we can see in this example, just as important.
Three recent stories with one theme in common: the rise of the middle class and the availability of credit. Looking at banks or diversified financials top-down is not our specialty and, as we’ve said in our Q3 2011 report, “is only of interest to us in order to gauge an important part of the risks”. Keeping this in mind, one of the articles is bullish and points to recent reports showing that credit here has actually accelerated in September, despite talks of banks – and financial authorities – reining in loan growth. The other two articles are also bullish but still reflect, in a way, the difficulties of sustaining such growth.
Two very recent stories on CDSs (credit default swaps) highlight the issue of Risk. Risk has a lot of aspects to it and some get overlooked, such as counterpart risk, process risk, instrument risk (liquidity, clarity of regulations, how tested it was in real-life distressed situation etc.)… Not reading the fine print, for instance, has led more investors astray than they would like to confess. Much has been said about CDO-Squared and complex instruments in general, but the CDS was actually not supposed to be complex. Even so, investors in Greek debt CDSs are finding that “default” may not be what they thought it was… And another side of the debate is counterpart risk: what if the instrument is good, the writing is clear and so on – but the counterparts (whoever they are in this immensely interconnected financial world) just can’t honor their side of the deal?
