<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buysiders.com &#187; retail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/tag/retail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br</link>
	<description>Investidor Profissional (IP)&#039;s blog: value investing across disciplines and around the globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is the &#8220;long tail&#8221; not that long?</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2011/01/25/is-the-long-tail-not-that-long/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2011/01/25/is-the-long-tail-not-that-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long_tail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article in the New York Times raises a red flag about the music industry: could digital music sales not be nearly enough to replace ever-decreasing CD revenues? This reminded us of Chris Anderson's 2006 classic book "The Long Tail". What if the long tail just isn't long enough to save some industries?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Anderson&#8217;s &#8220;<a title="The Long Tail at Amazon.com" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1401309666/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_p=1278548962&amp;pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&amp;pf_rd_t=201&amp;pf_rd_i=1401302378&amp;pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&amp;pf_rd_r=0P59E01VDY7R4V3BHPPB" target="_blank">The Long Tail</a>&#8221; (2006) is a great book about the power of choice enabled by the Internet &#8211; which &#8220;created&#8221; significant markets out of the deepest niches. His first example was the music industry, long in need of respite from ever-decreasing CD sales.</p>
<p><strong>2011:</strong> <a title="Music industry braces for the unthinkable - NYT.com" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/24/technology/24music.html" target="_blank">This New York Times article</a> argues that growth in digital music sales is stalling while sales are still at a level that doesn&#8217;t compensate for lost CD revenues, and wonders about the music industry&#8217;s &#8220;salvation&#8221; hopes. Unlike other digital media that are perhaps less prone to piracy, digital music just hasn&#8217;t found the right business model yet. Note that this doesn&#8217;t dismiss the book at all, it just shows that, in reverse of Mark Twain&#8217;s famous line, &#8220;the news of the music industry&#8217;s rescue have been greatly exaggerated&#8230;&#8221; Is it strictly a &#8220;speed of adoption&#8221; problem or does it point to a deeper problem &#8211; the long tail not being as long as imagined (or not as long as some industries need it to be) &#8211; and if so, what other insights could this yield for the &#8220;rest&#8221; of the media sector and for e-commerce?<span id="more-1704"></span></p>
<p>Also check out the <a title="The Long Tail, the Wired original" href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html" target="_blank">original (2004) article at Wired</a> and the <a title="The Long Tail blog (discontinued in Dec. 2009)" href="http://www.longtail.com/">Long Tail blog</a> (discontinued in 2009, but still interesting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2011/01/25/is-the-long-tail-not-that-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Group I.Q.</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/12/23/group-i-q/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/12/23/group-i-q/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective_intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independentthinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this: you've built a diverse, intelligent, hard-working team that successfully leverages individual abilities and skill sets into a higher collective intelligence. Then the same group of people have lunch in the nearby shopping mall and do dumb things (such as spending more on a "premium" brand) because they're in a group... Gotta love us humans. Inside we highlight two articles on the good and bad of group "intelligence".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this: you&#8217;ve built a diverse, intelligent, hard-working team that successfully leverages individual abilities and skill sets into a higher collective intelligence. Then the same group of people have lunch in the nearby shopping mall and do dumb things (such as spending more on a &#8220;premium&#8221; brand) because they&#8217;re in a group&#8230; Gotta love us humans. Inside we highlight two articles on the good and bad of group &#8220;intelligence&#8221;.<span id="more-1555"></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The good:</strong></span> The idea that groups of people can be better suited than individuals to take on some tasks has been around for a while, and we&#8217;ve discussed crowdsourcing on Buysiders.com rather extensively. The idea that you should foster diversity in the team building effort isn&#8217;t new either. That said, <a title="Group I.Q. at Boston.com" href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/12/19/group_iq/" target="_blank">this very interesting article looks at &#8220;Group I.Q.&#8221;</a> and tries to determine the collective intelligence of teams and when/ why it varies. It&#8217;s still preliminary research and it raises almost as many questions as it addresses, but it&#8217;s a great field to explore.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The bad:</strong></span> The <a title="5 tricks companies use - Globe and Mail" href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/personal-finance/household-finances/five-tricks-companies-use-to-part-us-from-our-cash/article1845471/" target="_blank">behavior number 3 in this article</a> (via Farnam Street blog) is another entry in the large collection of highlights of the dumb things we can do when we&#8217;re in groups. In this case, dumb shopping behavior. The 5 tricks come from Robin Lewis&#8217; (of <a title="The Robin Report" href="http://www.therobinreport.com/" target="_blank">The Robin Report newsletter</a>) new book, <a title="Robin Lewis' new book" href="http://www.newrulesofretail.com/" target="_blank">&#8220;The New Rules of Retail&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>The other posts at Buysiders.com regarding crowdsourcing/ groupthink:</p>
<p><a title="Where do Good Ideas Come From? at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2010/09/30/where-do-good-ideas-come-from/" target="_blank">Where do good ideas come from?</a> &#8211; Sept. 30th, 2010</p>
<p><a title="The end of management at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2010/09/09/the-end-of-management/" target="_blank">The end of management</a> &#8211; Sept. 9th, 2010</p>
<p><a title="Multidisciplinary approach at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2010/02/17/multidisciplinary-approach-and-communication/" target="_blank">Multidisciplinary approach and communication</a> &#8211; Feb. 17th, 2010</p>
<p><a title="The DARPA Red Balloon challenge at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/12/06/follow-the-red-balloon/" target="_blank">Follow the red balloon</a> &#8211; Dec. 6th, 2009</p>
<p><a title="Crowdsourcing Revisited at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/11/18/crowdsourcing-revisited/" target="_blank">Crowdsourcing revisited</a> &#8211; Nov. 18th, 2009</p>
<p><a title="Netflix's smart crowdsourcing initiative at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/" target="_blank">Netflix&#8217;s smart crouwdsourcing initiative</a> &#8211; Sept. 22nd, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/12/23/group-i-q/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommendation software in Brazil</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/12/10/recommendation-software-in-brazil/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/12/10/recommendation-software-in-brazil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datamining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor_web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=1501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've discussed the Netflix challenge in detail at Buysiders.com, and the "analytics"/ "data capturing and processing" theme is very important in our research. But we hadn't posted about examples in Brazil! This Exame magazine article (in portuguese) solves this and mentions a few companies, including Saraiva. As people may guess even before reading the article, yes, the people behind this Brazilian "recommendation software" company did participate in the original Netflix contest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve discussed the Netflix challenge in detail at Buysiders.com, as in <a title="Netflix's smart crowdsourcing initiative at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/" target="_blank">this Sept. 2009 post</a>. The <a title="Data-rich Facebook at Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2009/10/15/data-rich-facebook/" target="_blank">&#8220;analytics&#8221;</a>/ <a title="TIm O'Reilly explains the cloud - Buysiders.com" href="http://www.buysiders.com/2010/07/27/the-cloud-explained/" target="_blank">&#8220;data capturing and processing&#8221;</a> theme is very important in our research. But we hadn&#8217;t posted about examples in Brazil! <a title="Software that reads minds - Exame (in portuguese)" href="http://clipping.cservice.com.br/Extranet/materia/materia.aspx?materia=7208482&amp;canal=20620&amp;cliente=BAF6d2BB23o=" target="_blank">This Exame magazine article</a> (in portuguese) solves this and mentions a few companies, including Saraiva. As people may guess even before reading the article, yes, the people behind this Brazilian &#8220;recommendation software&#8221; company did participate in the original Netflix contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/12/10/recommendation-software-in-brazil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Profiled on “Portal Exame”</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/11/29/ip-profiled-on-%e2%80%9cportal-exame%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/11/29/ip-profiled-on-%e2%80%9cportal-exame%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate_governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfoliomanagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riskmanagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=1472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long interview with two IP partners (in Portuguese &#8211; we&#8217;re having it translated and will post it here), Cristiano Fonseca Filho and Fred Trigueiro. The talk was very informal and spanned IP’s pioneering story in the Brazilian financial market. It gives insight into how we apply some of the most important aspects of our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="IP Profiled on Portal Exame" href="http://exame.abril.com.br/seu-dinheiro/fundos/noticias/preferimos-acoes-de-oligopolios-diz-investidor-profissional" target="_blank">A long interview with two IP partners</a> (in Portuguese &#8211; we&#8217;re having it translated and will post it here), Cristiano Fonseca Filho and Fred Trigueiro. The talk was very informal and spanned IP’s pioneering story in the Brazilian financial market. It gives insight into how we apply some of the most important aspects of our culture: Ethics, Discipline and Patience, Independence…</p>
<p>As we say in the “<a title="Why We Write- Buysiders.com" href="../../../../../why-we-write/" target="_blank">Why we write</a>” section at Buysiders.com, <em>“Risk is much more about knowing very well who you’re dealing with than it is about greek letters.”</em> We also say: <em>“With this site we aim to show potential investors and investees a “live” window into most of what we look at and how we think.” We hope the site will start relationships with the right people, in an efficient manner.”</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/11/29/ip-profiled-on-%e2%80%9cportal-exame%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-commerce in Brazil, 2009 report</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/03/25/e-commerce-in-brazil-2009-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/03/25/e-commerce-in-brazil-2009-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signal or Noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal_or_noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webshoppers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick tidbits inside from e-bit's report about the state of the Brazilian e-commerce market in 2009 - Webshoppers, 21st edition (in portuguese and in PDF). We will discuss one company's specific performance in regards to these numbers in our upcoming Q1 2010 report, but we wanted to highlight a few general data points in advance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick tidbits inside from e-bit&#8217;s report about the state of the Brazilian e-commerce market in 2009 &#8211; <a title="Webshoppers, 21st edition report" href="http://www.webshoppers.com.br/webshoppers/webshoppers21.pdf" target="_blank">Webshoppers, 21st edition</a> (in portuguese and in PDF). We will discuss one company&#8217;s specific performance in regards to these numbers in our upcoming Q1 2010 report, but we wanted to highlight a few general data points in advance. The trick is not to read too much &#8211; or too little &#8211; into it.</p>
<p><span id="more-835"></span><strong>Quick highlights from the executive summary:</strong></p>
<p>- E-commerce grew 30% to R$ 10.6 Bi and average ticket of R$ 335 (up just 2.1%);</p>
<p>- 17.6mm people purchased something online in 2009, up 33%;</p>
<p>- Within that group, 77% did at least one purchase in the last 3 months of the survey;</p>
<p>- Quality logistics is the key for keeping delivery dates, which is a determining factor in customer satisfaction. <em>(Easier said than done!)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/03/25/e-commerce-in-brazil-2009-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whole Foods&#8217; surprising CEO</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/01/25/whole-foods-surprising-ceo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/01/25/whole-foods-surprising-ceo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnmackey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialresponsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wholefoods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Mackey, CEO of high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, was recently profiled in the New Yorker mag. Habits and idiosyncrasies aside - he is known for putting his "personal foot in his professional mouth" - the guy is not what one would expect: he's a libertarian capitalist at heart and digs Ayn Rand. Very importantly, it goes to show that "doing the right thing" as a corporation and earning profits - the more, the better - are far from incompatible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Mackey, the CEO of high-end grocery chain Whole Foods Corp., was <a title="John Mackey in the New Yorker mag" href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/01/04/100104fa_fact_paumgarten" target="_blank">recently profiled in the New Yorker magazine</a>. Habits and idiosyncrasies aside &#8211; he is known for putting his &#8220;<a title="Rage over Mackey's WSJ op-ed on Healthcare" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/18/the-whole-foods-health-ca_n_262471.html" target="_blank">personal foot in his professional mouth</a>&#8221; &#8211; the guy is not what one would expect: he&#8217;s a libertarian capitalist at heart and digs Ayn Rand. &#8220;Right-wing hippie&#8221; was the not-so-great label the New Yorker writer came up with. Very importantly, it goes to show that &#8220;doing the right thing&#8221; as a corporation and earning profits &#8211; the more, the better &#8211; are far from incompatible.<span id="more-655"></span></p>
<p>One excerpt we feel is important to highlight:</p>
<p><em>&#8221; </em>&#8216;We&#8217;re trying to do good. And we&#8217;re trying to make money. The more money we make, the more good we can do.&#8217;<em> &#8211; By this, he (John Mackey) had in mind not the traditional philanthropic argument that more money earned equals more to give away but, rather, that a good company&#8211;that is, his company&#8211;which sells good things and treats its employees, shareholders, customers, and suppliers well, can spread goodness simply by thriving. &#8220;</em></p>
<p>This &#8220;special bonus&#8221; is from Mr. Mackey&#8217;s editorial on health care in the Wall Street Journal (link below). It&#8217;s how he starts the piece and it&#8217;s a sentence by Margaret Thatcher, the UK&#8217;s former prime minister: <em>&#8220;The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people&#8217;s money.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>LINKS:</strong></span></p>
<p><a title="John Mackey's op-ed on Healthcare - WSJ" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html" target="_blank">The Whole Foods alternative to ObamaCare</a> &#8211; WSJ, Aug. 11th 2009 &#8211; The controversial op-ed on the Wall Street Journal about healthcare in the US. By stating that health care is no more of an intrinsic right than are food or shelter, Mr. Mackey made a lot of his &#8220;target customers&#8221; mad. This mix of personal and professional has led even Warren Buffett to shy away from personal views on issues with potential for backlash. One would think that Whole Foods has credit due to its long history of treating employees and suppliers well &#8211; as long as this last group complies with standards that ultimately raise the bar.</p>
<p><a title="Mackey steps down as Chairman" href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/12/john-mackey-whole-foods.php" target="_blank">Did he jump or was he pushed?</a> &#8211; John Mackey steps down as Chairman of Whole Foods &#8211; The Tree Hugger.com, Dec. 31st 2009</p>
<p><a title="Support is waning for Mackey" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/waylon-lewis/john-mackey-whole-foods-c_b_409842.html" target="_blank">John Mackey doesn&#8217;t believe in climate change</a> &#8211; The Huffington Post, Jan. 3rd 2010 &#8211; Almost funny in the way it chronicles Mr. Mackey&#8217;s fall-outs with Whole Foods&#8217; &#8220;target customer&#8221; over his personal opinions. This particular blogger has had enough because of his environmental views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2010/01/25/whole-foods-surprising-ceo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix doing the right things at the right time</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2009/10/05/netflix-doing-the-right-things-at-the-right-time/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2009/10/05/netflix-doing-the-right-things-at-the-right-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gustavo Ballvé</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[datamining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlineservices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buysiders.com/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netflix is one of the most admirable cases around on corporate strategy AND execution. It shows how you can make billions out of simple things. That said, they have to kill a lion a year to stay ahead. Investment-wise, we never got to the point where we felt we knew enough to invest in them - and don't regret not doing it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix is <a title="Netflix on Wired" href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-10/ff_netflix" target="_blank">one of the most admirable cases</a> around on corporate strategy AND execution. Their products are not exactly cutting edge, but their strategy, execution and specifically data use is out of this world. It shows how you can make billions out of simple things. That said, other than the data culture (a huge missed opportunity by Blockbuster in terms of the head start it could have had), they have to kill a lion a year to stay ahead. Investment-wise, we never got to the point where we felt we knew enough to invest in them &#8211; and don&#8217;t regret not doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2009/10/05/netflix-doing-the-right-things-at-the-right-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix&#8217;s smart crowdsourcing initiative</title>
		<link>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food for thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporatestrategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onlineservices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.invprof.com.br/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Netflix Prize has been awarded and it's a great example of crowdsourcing. But is such "open collaboration" a tool for every situation? How open do you really want to be? Some are looking at his and saying "hold your horses". That's always good advice in our book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, Netflix wanted to improve its movie recommendation system and decided on an experiment: let people have a go at it. The rules and official proposal are <a title="Netflix contest rules" href="http://www.netflixprize.com//rules" target="_blank">here</a>, but the main idea was that if you could improve Netflix&#8217;s recommendations by 10%, you&#8217;d get a cool US$ 1mm. That contest <a title="Netflix Prize official announcement" href="http://www.netflixprize.com//community/viewtopic.php?id=1537" target="_blank">ended on July 27th, 2009</a> with huge success &#8211; not just for the winners, <a title="Netflix Prize benefits even some &quot;losers&quot; - NYT" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/22/technology/internet/22netflix.html" target="_blank">but for other contestants as well</a> who claim that the internal payoff of the learning efforts involved was already over the US$ 10mm figure. It&#8217;s a great example of crowdsourcing, and there are <a title="Crowdsourcing journalism at The Guardian" href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/four-crowdsourcing-lessons-from-the-guardians-spectacular-expenses-scandal-experiment/" target="_blank">other examples</a> of so-called &#8220;Open&#8221; business models (<a title="Innocentive website" href="http://www.innocentive.com/" target="_blank">Innocentive</a> jumps to mind).</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not all that matters: is crowdsourcing then a substitute for companies&#8217; R&amp;D demands? Does it always work? How open do you really want to be? Some people <a title="The crowd is wise - when it's focused" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/19/technology/internet/19unboxed.html" target="_blank">are looking at it</a> and saying &#8220;hold your horses&#8221;. That&#8217;s always a good advice in our book.</p>
<p><span id="more-153"></span></p>
<p>As for Netflix, they&#8217;re happy enough to have a Netflix Prize 2 on the works. Very smart: it keeps the ball rolling and takes advantage of the community they built. The press coverage doesn&#8217;t hurt, either.</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s more. We&#8217;d argue that the benefits of the Netflix Prize in terms of research in statistics/ data mining/ etc. in large data sets may be felt for years. It&#8217;s interesting to consider this in terms of efficiency gains for many different types of companies. It&#8217;s something companies all around the world should be paying attention to.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video interview with Reed Hastings, Netflix&#8217;s CEO, at the time of the award.</p>
<p><object id="cnbcplayer" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="380" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="best" /><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="salign" value="lt" /><param name="src" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1269310369/code/cnbcplayershare" /><param name="name" value="cnbcplayer" /><embed id="cnbcplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="380" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1269310369/code/cnbcplayershare" name="cnbcplayer" salign="lt" bgcolor="#000000" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" quality="best" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Links:</span></strong></p>
<p><a title="Crowdsourcing on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing" target="_blank">Crowdsourcing page on Wikipedia</a></p>
<p><a title="The Rise of Crowdsourcing" href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html" target="_blank">Jeff Howe&#8217;s classic article on Wired</a>, his <a title="Jeff Howe's book at Amazon.com" href="http://www.amazon.com/Crowdsourcing-Power-Driving-Future-Business/dp/0307396215/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1248796206&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">book</a> and his <a title="Jeff Howe's blog" href="http://crowdsourcing.typepad.com/" target="_blank">blog</a></p>
<p><a title="Netflix Prize 2 - teaser" href="http://www.netflixprize.com//community/viewtopic.php?id=1520" target="_blank">The teaser for Netflix Prize 2</a></p>
<p><a title="Winning the Netflix Prize - NYT, Oct. '08" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html?_r=1" target="_blank">Winning the Netflix Prize</a> &#8211; NY Times, October 2008 (huge article with <a title="Search Engineers video - NYT, Oct. '08" href="http://video.nytimes.com/video/2008/11/21/magazine/1194833560594/search-engineers.html" target="_blank">a video</a> that apparently can&#8217;t be embedded here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog-en.investidorprofissional.com.br/2009/09/22/netflixs-smart-crowdsourcing-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

